Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) and Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) are quite different. In Queensland, the rules were intended to be "uniform, so far as practicable, for all three courts in the State stream" [ 5 ] – that is, to unify the procedure of the Supreme , District and Magistrates Court , not ...
Civil procedure (1) The strength of evidence necessary to establish facts on the balance of probabilities, may depend on the nature of what is sought to be proven. [5] (2) Subject to statute, the standard of proof in all civil proceedings is the balance of probabilities. [6] 7. MIMA v Khawar: 2002 210 CLR 1; [2002] HCA 14 Gleeson: 9104 Refugee ...
The Australian States did not participate in the conferences leading up to the Statute of Westminster 1931, which provided that no British Act should be deemed to extend to the dominions without the consent of the dominion. The Australian Government did not invoke the provisions of the statute until 1942.
Jones v Dunkel is a decision of the High Court of Australia, concerning inferences that may be drawn when a party fails to give evidence.. The case is notable for having originated 'the rule in Jones v Dunkel'; an important rule in Australian civil procedure.
In many respects Australian superior courts are similar to the Senior Courts of England and Wales. In Australia, superior courts generally: In Australia, superior courts generally: have unlimited jurisdiction in law and equity, [ 16 ] or at least are not subject to jurisdictional limits as to the remedies they may grant;
A court order is an official proclamation by a judge (or panel of judges) that defines the legal relationships between the parties to a hearing, a trial, an appeal or other court proceedings. [1]
The ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal was established via the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008, which took effect on 2 February 2009. [3]The tribunal took over the work of several existing tribunals and boards, including the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Small Claims Court, Discrimination Tribunal, Guardianship and Management of Property Tribunal, Mental Health Tribunal ...
The High Court exercises both original and appellate jurisdiction.. Sir Owen Dixon said on his swearing in as Chief Justice of Australia in 1952: [8]. The High Court's jurisdiction is divided in its exercise between constitutional and federal cases which loom so largely in the public eye, and the great body of litigation between man and man, or even man and government, which has nothing to do ...