enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: quality of good writing

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Article development - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_development

    A PDF brochure by the Wikimedia Foundation about how articles evolve, elements of good quality articles, and signs of poor quality articles.. Some of Wikipedia's articles are comprehensive right from the outset, but most start off as stubs and ideally grow into well-written, comprehensive articles with time.

  3. Readability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readability

    The writing experts all advise that, besides using a formula, observe all the norms of good writing, which are essential for writing readable texts. Writers should study the texts used by their audience and their reading habits. [95] This means that for a 5th-grade audience, the writer should study and learn good quality 5th-grade materials ...

  4. Wikipedia:Writing better articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_better...

    Articles start with a lead section (WP:CREATELEAD) summarising the most important points of the topic.The lead section is the first part of the article; it comes above the first header, and may contain a lead image which is representative of the topic, and/or an infobox that provides a few key facts, often statistical, such as dates and measurements.

  5. The Sense of Style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sense_of_Style

    Reverse-engineering good prose as the key to developing a writerly ear – The starting point for becoming a good writer is to be a good reader. Good writers are avid readers. They have absorbed a vast inventory of words, idioms, constructions, tropes, and rhetorical tricks, and with them a sensitivity to how they mesh and how they clash.

  6. Help:Assessing article quality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Assessing_article_quality

    Almost all articles on Wikipedia are given a quality rating. However, beyond good and featured articles, these ratings are not subject to community review, highly subjective, and not kept well up-to-date, so they should be taken with a grain of salt. To find an article's rating, go to its talk page and look for the WikiProject banners.

  7. Wikipedia:Good article criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article...

    Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles—guidelines for reviewing an article for GA status; Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Quality Control/Reviewing Cheatsheet—useful suggestions for GA review; Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not—GA reviews should be concluded only in accordance with the GA criteria, not personal preferences

  8. Wikipedia:WikiProject Writing/Assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    This quality assessment criteria has been developed by WikiProject articles for creation as a standard guidelines for quality assessment. WikiProject Writing has placed article examples for several examples sections of the criteria, but we still need help improving articles to featured article status and featured list status.

  9. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    They translated edit histories of millions of Wikipedia editors into a 7-point political identification scale and compared that with Wikipedia's six-level article quality score (stub, start, C, B, good, featured) assigned via a machine learning algorithm. They found that "articles attracting more attention tend to have more balanced engagement ...

  1. Ads

    related to: quality of good writing