Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(Note that the value of the expression is independent of the value of n, which is why it does not appear in the integral.) ∫ x x ⋅ ⋅ x ⏟ m d x = ∑ n = 0 m ( − 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) n − 1 n !
For real non-zero values of x, the exponential integral Ei(x) is defined as = =. The Risch algorithm shows that Ei is not an elementary function.The definition above can be used for positive values of x, but the integral has to be understood in terms of the Cauchy principal value due to the singularity of the integrand at zero.
A different technique, which goes back to Laplace (1812), [3] is the following. Let = =. Since the limits on s as y → ±∞ depend on the sign of x, it simplifies the calculation to use the fact that e −x 2 is an even function, and, therefore, the integral over all real numbers is just twice the integral from zero to infinity.
The integral (+) = is proportional to the Fourier transform of the Gaussian where J is the conjugate variable of x. By again completing the square we see that the Fourier transform of a Gaussian is also a Gaussian, but in the conjugate variable.
n = 1 that yield a minimax approximation or bound for the closely related Q-function: Q(x) ≈ Q̃(x), Q(x) ≤ Q̃(x), or Q(x) ≥ Q̃(x) for x ≥ 0. The coefficients {( a n , b n )} N n = 1 for many variations of the exponential approximations and bounds up to N = 25 have been released to open access as a comprehensive dataset.
The main idea is to express an integral involving an integer parameter (e.g. power) of a function, represented by I n, in terms of an integral that involves a lower value of the parameter (lower power) of that function, for example I n-1 or I n-2. This makes the reduction formula a type of recurrence relation. In other words, the reduction ...
This means that the upper and lower sums of the function f are evaluated on a partition a = x 0 ≤ x 1 ≤ . . . ≤ x n = b whose values x i are increasing. Geometrically, this signifies that integration takes place "left to right", evaluating f within intervals [ x i , x i +1 ] where an interval with a higher index lies to the right of one ...
As for g, the essential case is that g is a product of bump functions of x i. Assuming now without loss of generality that P is the origin, take a smooth bump function h with value 1 on the interval [−1, 1] and quickly tending to 0 outside it. Take = (),