Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014), is a landmark decision [1] [2] in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing privately held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation that its owners religiously object to, if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom ...
As a result of the case, Hobby Lobby agreed to return the artifacts and forfeit $3 million. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement returned 3,800 items seized from Hobby Lobby to Iraq in May 2018. [2] In March 2020, Hobby Lobby president Steve Green agreed to return 11,500 items to Egypt and Iraq. [3] [4]
An HR specialist told her the dog was a “safety hazard,” according to a federal lawsuit. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways ...
Oklahoman and Hobby Lobby founder David Green is one of a few billionaires whose donations have gone toward organizations dedicated to election integrity going into the 2024 presidential election ...
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. to review the ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. [1] The Christian-based retail franchise Hobby Lobby argued that the mandate violated its free exercise of religion rights established by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and affirmed in the Religious Freedom ...
An Olathe building — formerly Hobby Lobby and Goodwill — has sat empty for four years.. But the 110,000-square-foot space, at 16630 W. 135th St. near North Mur-Len Road, may soon see visitors ...
Hobby Lobby Stores v. Sebelius, 723 F.3d 1114 (10th Cir. 2013): The court found for-profit corporations Hobby Lobby and Mardel Christian Bookstores could assert religious freedom as "persons" under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [9] Judge Tymkovich wrote for the five-judge en banc majority, over a three-judge dissent. [10]
Hobby Lobby (2014), a case about how the contraception requirement in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act affected closely held for-profit corporations. [ 2 ] See also