enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Chinese nationality law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_nationality_law

    Before the mid-19th century, nationality issues involving China were extremely rare and could be handled on an individual basis. [2] Customary law dictated that children born to Chinese subjects took the nationality of the father, but did not have clear rules for renunciation of citizenship or the naturalization of aliens. [3]

  3. United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), was a landmark decision [4] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any ...

  4. Naturalization Act of 1870 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1870

    By virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment and despite the 1870 Act, the US Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) recognized US birthright citizenship of an American-born child of Chinese parents who had a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and who were there carrying on business, and were not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of ...

  5. Why the US has birthright citizenship and how Trump could ...

    www.aol.com/news/why-us-birthright-citizenship...

    The US has birthright citizenship to guarantee that the descendants of people brought to the US against their will and sold as slaves are citizens. ... back into the country after a trip to China ...

  6. Asian immigration to the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_immigration_to_the...

    1882 Chinese Exclusion Act: Cessation of immigration from China. [44] 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark: A US-born son of Chinese immigrants was ruled to be a US citizen under the birthright citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment; the Chinese Exclusion Act was held not to apply to someone born in the US. 1915 Guinn & Beal v.

  7. Chae Chan Ping v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chae_Chan_Ping_v._United...

    Chae Chan Ping v. United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889), better known as the Chinese Exclusion Case, [1]: 30 was a case decided by the US Supreme Court on May 13, 1889, that challenged the Scott Act of 1888, an addendum to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.

  8. For 126 years, U.S. courts have recognized children born in this country as American citizens. President-elect Donald Trump plans to overturn that understanding by issuing an executive order on ...

  9. What is birthright citizenship and the 14th amendment ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/birthright-citizenship-14th...

    The clause, "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," most commonly excludes children born to foreign diplomats, USA TODAY previously reported. Trump has long promised to end birthright citizenship