Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In statistics, one-way analysis of variance (or one-way ANOVA) is a technique to compare whether two or more samples' means are significantly different (using the F distribution). This analysis of variance technique requires a numeric response variable "Y" and a single explanatory variable "X", hence "one-way".
The formula for the one-way ANOVA F-test statistic is =, or =. The "explained variance", or "between-group variability" is = (¯ ¯) / where ¯ denotes the sample mean in the i-th group, is the number of observations in the i-th group, ¯ denotes the overall mean of the data, and denotes the number of groups.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a collection of statistical models and their associated estimation procedures (such as the "variation" among and between groups) used to analyze the differences between groups. It uses F-test by comparing variance between groups and taking noise, or assumed normal distribution of group, into consideration by ...
In statistics, the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is an extension of the one-way ANOVA that examines the influence of two different categorical independent variables on one continuous dependent variable. The two-way ANOVA not only aims at assessing the main effect of each independent variable but also if there is any interaction between them.
Compact Letter Display (CLD) is a statistical method to clarify the output of multiple hypothesis testing when using the ANOVA and Tukey's range tests. CLD can also be applied following the Duncan's new multiple range test (which is similar to Tukey's range test).
To determine if there is a significant difference between two means with equal sample sizes, the Newman–Keuls method uses a formula that is identical to the one used in Tukey's range test, which calculates the q value by taking the difference between two sample means and dividing it by the standard error:
In statistics, a mixed-design analysis of variance model, also known as a split-plot ANOVA, is used to test for differences between two or more independent groups whilst subjecting participants to repeated measures.
From the example in Figure 1, the variance of the differences between Treatment A and B (17) appear to be much greater than the variance of the differences between Treatment A and C (10.3) and between Treatment B and C (10.3). This suggests that the data may violate the assumption of sphericity.