Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ohio Supreme Court Justice Michael Donnelly, a Democrat seeking reelection this year, wrote that "everyone should be outraged by today’s decision, regardless of whether one thinks the proposed ...
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that the Stark County Board of Elections could only discuss in executive session the purchase of voting machines if "premature disclosure" of the information ...
Oct. 15—OHIO — As Ohioans head to the polls this election season, a topic of discussion is Issue 1, a proposed constitutional amendment to overhaul the state's redistricting process.
"The fact that the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio concludes the relevant statute does not grant me authority to review the title does not change my determination that it is ...
But the court isn't as divided as it seems at first glance. Since 2019, most decisions - 63.5% - are unanimous, according to research done by the court. When it comes to split decisions from the ...
Two cases came from Ohio, the first ultimately involving a male couple, a widower, and a funeral director. In June 2013, following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Windsor, James "Jim" Obergefell and John Arthur decided to marry to obtain legal recognition of their relationship. They married in Maryland on July 11.
The Ohio Supreme Court set the deadline Friday. At issue is a Jan. 25 finding by Yost that the proposed constitutional amendment's title — “Ohio Voters Bill of Rights” — was “highly ...
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.