Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
While some scholars argue that Mark 16 is a Markan composition, [4] others argue that the chapter comes from an older tradition in the pre-Markan passion story. [5] Those arguing in favor of Markan creation point to the numerous time indicators in verse 2, which bear similarities to other phrases in Mark. [6]
The stylistic differences suggest that none of these was written by the author of the Gospel of St. Mark. Metzger speaks of the "inconcinnities" between the first 8 verses of chapter 16 and the longer ending, and suggests, "all these features indicate that the section was added by someone who knew a form of Mark that ended abruptly with verse 8 ...
A medieval legendary account had Mary Magdalene, Mary of Jacob and Mary Salome, [10] Mark's Three Marys at the Tomb, or Mary Magdalene, Mary of Cleopas and Mary Salome, [11] with Saint Sarah, the maid of one of them, as part of a group who landed near Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer in Provence after a voyage from the Holy Land.
Codex Boreelianus, Mark 1:1-5a. Mark 1:1. Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (of Jesus Christ) – א* Θ 28 c 530 582* 820* 1021 1436 1555* 1692 2430 2533 l 2211 cop sa(ms) arm geo 1 Origen gr Origen lat Victorinus-Pettau Asterius Serapion Titus-Bostra Basil Cyril-Jerusalem Severian Jerome 3/6 Hesychius WH text Riv mg NM [6]
Mark 16:1–8 probably represents a complete unit of oral tradition taken over by the author. [17] It concludes with the women fleeing from the empty tomb and telling no one what they have seen, and the general scholarly view is that this was the original ending of this gospel, with the remaining verses, Mark 16:9–16, being added later.
A young man in a robe also appears in Mark 16:5–7. Mark does not name the High Priest. [115] Witness testimony against Jesus does not agree. [116] The cock crows "twice" as predicted. [117] See also Fayyum Fragment. The other Gospels simply record, "the cock crew". Early codices 01, W, and most Western texts have the simpler version. [118]
A gospel harmony is an attempt to collate the Christian canonical gospels into a single account. [1] Harmonies are constructed by some writers in order to make the gospel story available to a wider audience, both religious and secular. [2]
Section 13.1 is completely useless and so should be deleted. It simply restates what the other says earlier -- that scholars think Mark 16:9-20 is added, but just in a much longer space. It also has some fringe views about the ending being authentic from Craig Evans. Totally useless, hard to read, redundant.