enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Barnard's test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnard's_test

    Under pressure from Fisher, Barnard retracted his test in a published paper, [8] however many researchers prefer Barnard’s exact test over Fisher's exact test for analyzing 2 × 2 contingency tables, [9] since its statistics are more powerful for the vast majority of experimental designs, whereas Fisher’s exact test statistics are conservative, meaning the significance shown by its p ...

  3. Boschloo's test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boschloo's_test

    Boschloo's test is a statistical hypothesis test for analysing 2x2 contingency tables. It examines the association of two Bernoulli distributed random variables and is a uniformly more powerful alternative to Fisher's exact test. It was proposed in 1970 by R. D. Boschloo. [1]

  4. Contingency table - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingency_table

    The example above is the simplest kind of contingency table, a table in which each variable has only two levels; this is called a 2 × 2 contingency table. In principle, any number of rows and columns may be used. There may also be more than two variables, but higher order contingency tables are difficult to represent visually.

  5. Fisher's exact test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher's_exact_test

    For hand calculations, the test is feasible only in the case of a 2 × 2 contingency table. However the principle of the test can be extended to the general case of an m × n table, [9] [10] and some statistical packages provide a calculation (sometimes using a Monte Carlo method to obtain an approximation) for the more general case. [11]

  6. Yates's correction for continuity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yates's_correction_for...

    The effect of Yates's correction is to prevent overestimation of statistical significance for small data. This formula is chiefly used when at least one cell of the table has an expected count smaller than 5. = = The following is Yates's corrected version of Pearson's chi-squared statistics:

  7. McNemar's test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McNemar's_test

    The Cochran's Q test is an extension of the McNemar's test for more than two "treatments". The Liddell's exact test is an exact alternative to McNemar's test. [10] [11] The Stuart–Maxwell test is different generalization of the McNemar test, used for testing marginal homogeneity in a square table with more than two rows/columns. [12] [13] [14]

  8. Total operating characteristic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_operating_characteristic

    The diagnosis of presence or absence depends on whether the value of the index is above a threshold. TOC considers multiple possible thresholds. Each threshold generates a two-by-two contingency table, which contains four entries: hits, misses, false alarms, and correct rejections. [1]

  9. Pearson's chi-squared test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson's_chi-squared_test

    Each observation is allocated to one cell of a two-dimensional array of cells (called a contingency table) according to the values of the two outcomes. If there are r rows and c columns in the table, the "theoretical frequency" for a cell, given the hypothesis of independence, is , =,