enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: common knowledge vs citation research

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Common knowledge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Knowledge

    Common knowledge is knowledge that is publicly known by everyone or nearly everyone, usually with reference to the community in which the knowledge is referenced. [1] Common knowledge can be about a broad range of subjects, such as science, literature , history, or entertainment . [ 1 ]

  3. Wikipedia:Common knowledge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_knowledge

    Certain kinds of claims should most definitely not be left to common knowledge without citations: Controversial claims Facts about which Wikipedians themselves disagree cannot form a rough consensus. Claims in areas of fact or opinion about which there is known to be controversy. This includes political and religious ideas.

  4. Wikipedia : Scientific citation guidelines

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Scientific...

    Therefore, in sections or articles that present well-known and uncontroversial information – information that is readily available in most common and obvious books on the subject – it is acceptable to give an inline citation for one or two authoritative sources (and possibly a more accessible source, if one is available) in such a way as to ...

  5. Citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation

    xkcd webcomic titled "Wikipedian Protester". The sign says: "[CITATION NEEDED]".[1]A citation is a reference to a source. More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of ...

  6. Help:Citations quick reference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Citations_quick_reference

    Citations can also be placed as external links, but these are not preferred because they are prone to link rot and usually lack the full information necessary to find the original source in cases of link rot. In cases where citations are lacking, the template {} can be added after the statement in question.

  7. Scientific citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_citation

    Today, automated citation indexing [8] has changed the nature of citation analysis research, allowing millions of citations to be analyzed for large-scale patterns and knowledge discovery. Citation analysis tools can be used to compute various impact measures for scholars based on data from citation indices.

  8. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    The number of citations may be misleading if an author cites themselves often. Isolated studies – Isolated studies are usually considered tentative and may change in the light of further academic research. If the isolated study is a primary source, it should generally not be used if there are secondary sources that cover the same content.

  9. Wikipedia : Content that could reasonably be challenged

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_that...

    Furthermore, there are many statements that may not be prone to challenge, but which it would still be reasonable to request a citation for. For instance: The Moon is the Earth's only natural satellite: While it is common knowledge that the Moon orbits the Earth, a reader might reasonably wonder whether any other natural body does.

  1. Ad

    related to: common knowledge vs citation research