enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of programming languages (string functions)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    (compare string 1 string 2) Clojure (string= string 1 string 2) Common Lisp (string-compare string 1 string 2 p< p= p>) Scheme (SRFI 13) (string= string 1 string 2) ISLISP: compare string 1 string 2: OCaml: String.compare (string 1, string 2) Standard ML [5] compare string 1 string 2: Haskell [6] [string]::Compare(string 1, string 2) Windows ...

  3. Comparison of programming languages (syntax) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Block comments in Perl are considered part of the documentation, and are given the name Plain Old Documentation (POD). Technically, Perl does not have a convention for including block comments in source code, but POD is routinely used as a workaround. PHP. PHP supports standard C/C++ style comments, but supports Perl style as well. Python

  4. Comparison of programming languages (basic instructions)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    If no invalid value can be found for a type (for example in case of an unconstraint integer type), a valid, yet predictable value is chosen instead. ^f In Rust, if no initial value is given to a let or let mut variable and it is never assigned to later, there is an "unused variable" warning .

  5. Comparison of programming languages (strings) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    COBOL uses the STRING statement to concatenate string variables. MATLAB and Octave use the syntax "[x y]" to concatenate x and y. Visual Basic and Visual Basic .NET can also use the "+" sign but at the risk of ambiguity if a string representing a number and a number are together. Microsoft Excel allows both "&" and the function "=CONCATENATE(X,Y)".

  6. Comparison of programming languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    The literature on programming languages contains an abundance of informal claims about their relative expressive power, but there is no framework for formalizing such statements nor for deriving interesting consequences. [52] This table provides two measures of expressiveness from two different sources.

  7. Comparison of programming languages (array) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Comparison of ALGOL 68 and C++; ALGOL 68: Comparisons with other languages; Compatibility of C and C++; Comparison of Pascal and Borland Delphi; Comparison of Object Pascal and C; Comparison of Pascal and C; Comparison of Java and C++; Comparison of C# and Java; Comparison of C# and Visual Basic .NET; Comparison of Visual Basic and Visual Basic ...

  8. printf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printf

    These functions accept a format string parameter and a variable number of value parameters that the function serializes per the format string and writes to an output stream or a string buffer. The format string is encoded as a template language consisting of verbatim text and format specifiers that each specify how to serialize a value.

  9. Comparison of programming languages (associative array)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Comparison of ALGOL 68 and C++; ALGOL 68: Comparisons with other languages; Compatibility of C and C++; Comparison of Pascal and Borland Delphi; Comparison of Object Pascal and C; Comparison of Pascal and C; Comparison of Java and C++; Comparison of C# and Java; Comparison of C# and Visual Basic .NET; Comparison of Visual Basic and Visual Basic ...