enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Opinion: The election shredded the rule of law - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-election-shredded-rule...

    Being elected president truly is a get-out-of-jail-free card for Donald Trump, but the greater concern should be for what this means for the rule of law in this country. On Friday, New York Judge ...

  3. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    In R v Burgess [1991] 2 QB 92 the Court of Appeal ruled that the defendant, who wounded a woman by hitting her with a video recorder while sleepwalking, was insane under the M'Naghten Rules. Lord Lane said, "We accept that sleep is a normal condition, but the evidence in the instant case indicates that sleepwalking, and particularly violence in ...

  4. Jack Smith, in final report, says voters saved Trump from ...

    www.aol.com/doj-provides-congress-jack-smiths...

    Special counsel Jack Smith's final report lays out in no uncertain terms federal prosecutors' position that Donald Trump -- who is set to be inaugurated president in less than a week -- would have ...

  5. Trump would have been convicted if not elected, DoJ report says

    www.aol.com/judge-clears-way-release-trump...

    A prosecutor says there was enough evidence in the 2020 US election case - but he was scuppered by Trump's win in 2024. ... knowingly spreading lies about election fraud and seeking to exploit the ...

  6. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits...

    Trump, his attorneys, and his supporters falsely [12] asserted widespread election fraud in public statements, but few such assertions were made in court. [13] Every state except Wisconsin [14] met the December 8 statutory "safe harbor" deadline to resolve disputes and certify voting results. The Trump legal team had said it would not consider ...

  7. Tanner v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_v._United_States

    Federal Rules of Evidence § 606(b) United States , 483 U.S. 107 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that juror testimony could not be used to discredit or overturn a jury verdict, even if the jury had been consuming copious amounts of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine throughout the course of the trial.

  8. After Trump's win, his election denial movement marches on - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/trumps-win-election-denial...

    A faction of local and national Republican officials who amplified Trump’s claims of a rigged 2020 election say they will keep pushing for stark changes to how Americans vote ahead of the 2026 ...

  9. Texas v. Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Pennsylvania

    Texas v. Pennsylvania, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a lawsuit filed at the United States Supreme Court contesting the administration of the 2020 presidential election in four states in which Joe Biden defeated then-incumbent president Donald Trump.