Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the pre-emption clause of the Medical Device Amendment bars state common-law claims that challenge the effectiveness or safety of a medical device marketed in a form that received premarket approval from the Food and Drug Administration.
In 2007, Medtronic purchased Kyphon, a manufacturer and seller of spinal implants that are necessary for procedures like kyphoplasty. [77] In May 2008, Medtronic Spine agreed to pay the US government $75 million to settle a qui tam lawsuit after a whistleblower alleged that Medtronic committed Medicare fraud. The company was charged with ...
In 2005, Michelson sold many of his spine-related patents to Medtronic for $1.35 billion, [13] placing him on the Forbes 400 list. [14] A legal battle with Medtronic over the origins of the patents preceded the sale. In 2004, Michelson cross-filed in response to Medtronic's 2001 suit, and was awarded financial damages for both lawsuits by the ...
Medtronic is upping the ante in patent dispute with competitor Axonics Inc. that has already lasted more than four years. The dispute centers on Medtronic's InterStim device, an implanted ...
A spinal cord stimulator (SCS) or dorsal column stimulator (DCS) is a type of implantable neuromodulation device (sometimes called a "pain pacemaker") that is used to send electrical signals to select areas of the spinal cord (dorsal columns) for the treatment of certain pain conditions.
A York County jury has awarded $23.87 million in a medical malpractice lawsuit to James Spangler, 58, of Manchester, who suffered catastrophic injuries following a spinal surgery at York Hospital.
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the scope of federal preemption. [1] It was later limited by Riegel v.
Dr. Anil Kesani, a Dallas-Fort Worth surgeon, says a lawsuit against him is filled with inconsistencies and factual inaccuracies. Doctor defends against malpractice claim, says suit wrongfully ...