enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Patent Act of 1836 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_Act_of_1836

    The Patent Act of 1836 (Pub. L. 24–357, 5 Stat. 117, enacted July 4, 1836) established a number of important changes in the United States patent system. [1] These include: The examination of patent applications prior to issuing a patent. This was the second time this was done anywhere in the world.

  3. Patent racism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_racism

    [19] [20] This Confederate Patent Act explicitly allowed slave owners to patent inventions made by their slaves, in contrast to United States patent law, which had previously denied such applications. [18] On June 28, 1864, Montgomery, no longer a slave, filed a patent application for his device, but the patent office again rejected his ...

  4. United States patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_patent_law

    1790. First Patent Act empowered the Secretary of State, the Secretary for the Department of War, and the Attorney General to examine patents for inventions deemed "sufficiently useful and important." 1793. Second Patent Act eliminated examination of patent applications, emphasized enablement requirement. This Act did not have a requirement for ...

  5. History of United States patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_United_States...

    Obtaining patents became much easier during the period after the Patent Act of 1793 and the next federal Patent Act passed in 1836. Between the Patent Act of 1790 and that of 1793, only 57 patents were granted, but by July 2, 1836, a total of 10,000 patents had been granted. [17] This however, came at an expense of the quality of patents granted.

  6. Tyler v. Tuel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler_v._Tuel

    The Tyler rule was abrogated by the Patent Act of 1836. [10] In consequence, Tyler has seldom been cited since the 1830s, except in historical reviews. In 1868, the Supreme Court noted Tyler ' s obsolescence in Moore v. Marsh, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 515 (1868). The 1836 act, however, only affected geographically divided interests.

  7. History of patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_patent_law

    The patent laws were again revised in 1836, [23] and the examination of patent applications was reinstituted. [24] In 1870 Congress passed a law which mainly reorganized and reenacted existing law, but also made some important changes, such as giving the commissioner of patents the authority to draft rules and regulations for the Patent Office ...

  8. 1836 U.S. Patent Office fire - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1836_U.S._Patent_Office_fire

    The 1836 U.S. Patent Office fire was the first of two major fires the U.S. Patent Office has had in its history. It occurred in Blodget's Hotel building, Washington on December 15, 1836. An initial investigation considered the possibility of arson due to suspected corruption in the Post Office, which shared the same building, but it was later ...

  9. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Patent Act of 1800 Effect of a reissued patent having a corrected specification Hogg v. Emerson: 47 U.S. (6 How.) 437 1848 improved machine – steam engine Justice Woodbury Patent Act of 1836, Section 17 Gayler v. Wilder: 51 U.S. 477: 1850: Novelty means knowledge or use accessible to the public. Hotchkiss v. Greenwood: 52 U.S. 248: 1850