Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Everybody associated with this scam, except for Elite Wiki Writers, comes out a loser. Wikipedians are victims because the encyclopedia's trademarks are used without permission. Volunteers' time, Wikipedia's most valuable resource, is wasted sorting out hundreds of poorly researched articles, looking for one just one or two notable subjects.
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning appears nowhere in the results. As sleazy of a realm as SEO is, if we want people at risk of the scam to find the warning, then we should probably better optimize our warning so that it has a fighting chance of showing up for the searches they're likely to make.
scam warning! If you have been contacted or solicited by anyone asking for payment to get a draft into article space, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article, such offers are not legitimate and you should contact paid-en-wp wikipedia.org immediately.
Spoof of National Review. [21] NBC.com.co NBC.com.co Imitates NBC. [23] [21] NBCNews.com.co NBCNews.com.co Defunct Mimics the URL, design and logo of NBC News. [24] News Examiner newsexaminer.net Started in 2015 by Paul Horner, the lead writer of the National Report. This website has been known to mix real news along with its fake news. [25]
American Journal Review Americanjournalreview.com Per FactCheck.org. [5] American News (Anews-24.com) Anews-24.com Per FactCheck.org and PolitiFact. Published the same story as Daily Feed News. Copied story from The Last Line of Defense. [5] [1] [13] [14] The American News Theamericanews.co Per FactCheck.org. [7] American Pride Americanprides.com
Fake news websites deliberately publish hoaxes, propaganda, and disinformation to drive web traffic inflamed by social media. [8] [9] [10] These sites are distinguished from news satire as fake news articles are usually fabricated to deliberately mislead readers, either for profit or more ambiguous reasons, such as disinformation campaigns.
Wikipedia Year in Review: Soon, readers will enjoy a look back at the year, both as a micro site and within the IOS app. There will be a donation ask included in the experience. We’re excited to hear your feedback and will continue to be available through this page through early January. Sheetal Puri (WMF) 19:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
A 2006 review of Wikipedia by Library Journal, using a panel of librarians, "the toughest critics of reference materials, whatever their format", asked "long standing reviewers" to evaluate three areas of Wikipedia (popular culture, current affairs, and science), and concluded: "While there are still reasons to proceed with caution when using a ...