Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Retracted articles are not removed from the published literature but marked as retracted. In some cases it may be necessary to remove an article from publication, such as when the article is clearly defamatory, violates personal privacy, is the subject of a court order, or might pose a serious health risk to the general public. [1]
The reasons for doing so are varied and can include the addition of elements to adjust the underlying conclusions of the text to suit the redactor's opinion, adding bridging elements to integrate disparate stories, or the redactor may add a frame story, such as the tale of Scheherazade which frames the collection of folk tales in The Book of ...
A heavily redacted page from a 2004 lawsuit filed by the ACLU — American Civil Liberties Union v. Ashcroft Ashcroft Redacting confidential material from a paper document before its public release involves overwriting portions of text with a wide black pen, followed by photocopying the result—the obscured text may be recoverable from the ...
My Story Got Redacted, So I Wore It Instead Samantha Brooks / Courtesy of the subject "Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
Writing for Popzara, Trent McGee described it as "a modern fable [that] may be one of the best short stories King has ever published" and as "almost a reworking on the story of Job". [11] Bev Vincent described "The Answer Man" as "a beautiful and poignant story that shows how a skilled writer can encapsulate a rich life in a mere fifty pages". [1]
Retraction Watch is a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers and on related topics. [1] The blog was launched in August 2010 [2] and is produced by science writers Ivan Oransky (Former Vice President, Editorial Medscape) [3] and Adam Marcus (editor of Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News). [4]
In September 2003, the paper was retracted. In a statement published in ‘’Science’’, the research team indicated that due to a labelling error, methamphetamine had been administered to 9 of the 10 test animals instead of MDMA. The team had consistently been unable to replicate the original results, which lead to them conducting an ...
CBS accused of deceptively editing interviews yet again as Speaker Johnson claims interview was ‘selectively’ trimmed