Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The substantial disruption test is a criterion set forth by the United States Supreme Court, in the leading case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). [1]
The children's fathers filed suit in the U.S. District Court, which upheld the decision of the Des Moines school board. A tie vote in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit meant that the U.S. District Court's decision continued to stand, which forced the Tinkers and Eckhardts to appeal to the Supreme Court directly.
Iowa's capital city is revisiting its policy on homeless encampments with a more "assertive" focus on the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling that people experiencing homelessness can ...
Following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Des Moines leaders look to ban camping and reduce time for people to remove belongings from public spaces Des Moines proposes 'harder-line' on homelessness ...
The legislation was published 20 days after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an Oregon city could arrest and punish people for camping in public without violating the Constitution. The ruling ...
Since such motions are extremely common, Anderson has become the most-cited Supreme Court case. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) Scientific evidence that is admitted in federal court must be valid and relevant to the case at hand.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Kermit L. Hall, ed. The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions. Kermit L. Hall, ed. Alley, Robert S. (1999). The Constitution & Religion: Leading Supreme Court Cases on Church and State. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-703-1