Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
How long will tenants have to repay COVID-19 rent debts? Under the new rules, tenants will have until Aug. 1 to pay back rent accumulated between March 1, 2020, and Sept. 30, 2021. They will have ...
About 650,000 units in the city were built before Oct. 1, 1978, and are regulated by the rent-stabilization ordinance. That’s nearly 75% of L.A.’s apartments.
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors voted 3 to 2 to ask staff to draft a change to rent stabilization rules. Under the proposal, many landlords in unincorporated L.A. County would be barred from ...
Rent control laws define which rental units are affected, and may only cover larger complexes, or units older than a certain date. To attempt to not disincentivise investment in new housing stock, rent control laws often exempt new construction. For example, San Francisco's Rent Stabilization Ordinance exempts all units built after 1979. [63]
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 26 November 2024. Regulations to reduce increases in housing rents "Rent control" redirects here. For other uses, see Rent control (disambiguation). Part of a series on Living spaces Main House: detached semi-detached terraced Apartment Bungalow Cottage Ecohouse Green home Housing project Human outpost I ...
City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board, [217] the First District Court of Appeals interpreted Costa–Hawkins in the context of an evidentiary presumption in Berkeley's rent ordinance that presumes that, where a tenant has moved out after a termination notice, the tenant moved out because of the notice. One accepted way for a landlord to ...
This proposal would apply to only a relatively narrow sliver of the city's rental stock, since the city's rent stabilization ordinance and statewide rent cap provisions already prohibit such rent ...
City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Los Angeles law, Municipal Code § 41.49, requiring hotel operators to retain records about guests for a 90-day period, is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it does not allow for pre-compliance review.