Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CamGEL [n 1]) is a descriptive grammar of the English language. Its primary authors are Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum. Huddleston was the only author to work on every chapter. It was published by Cambridge University Press in 2002 and has been cited more than 8,000 times. [1]
Geoffrey Keith Pullum (/ ˈ p ʊ l əm /; born 8 March 1945) is a British and American linguist specialising in the study of English.Pullum has published over 300 articles and books on various topics in linguistics, including phonology, morphology, semantics, pragmatics, computational linguistics, and philosophy of language.
For some time, Huddleston ran a project under Halliday in the Communications Research Centre at The University of London called the “OSTI Programme in the Linguistic Properties of Scientific English.” [5] (OSTI was the UK government's Office for Scientific and Technical Information.) [6] As a student of Halliday's, Huddleston was a proponent of Systemic Functional Grammar, [5] but as his ...
Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM
The English subjunctive is realized as a finite but tenseless clause.Subjunctive clauses use a bare or plain verb form, which lacks any inflection.For instance, a subjunctive clause would use the verb form "be" rather than "am/is/are" and "arrive" rather than "arrives", regardless of the person and number of the subject.
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston and Pullum, published in 2002 Topics referred to by the same term This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title CGEL .
Right then: In their introductory grammar text A Student's Introduction to English Grammar, Huddleston and Pullum have the following exercise: For each of the following words or expressions, construct one example where it behaves as a non-affirmative item and one where it is not polarity-sensitive: [i] anything , [ii] kick the bucket , [iii ...
The main argument given by Huddleston and Pullum (pp 209–10) that English does not have a future tense is that "will" is a modal verb, both in its grammar and in its meaning. Biber et al. go further and say that English has only two tenses, past and present: they treat the perfect forms with "have" under " aspect ".