enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

   FOSS stands for "Free and Open Source Software". There is no one universally agreed-upon definition of FOSS software and various groups maintain approved lists of licenses. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses. [1] The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it ...

3. Open-source license - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license

   Popular open source licenses include the Apache License, the MIT License, the GNU General Public License (GPL), the BSD Licenses, the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) and the Mozilla Public License (MPL). Open-source licenses are software licenses that allow content to be used, modified, and shared. They facilitate free and open-source ...

4. List of free-content licences - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_free-content_licences

   For information on software-related licences, see Comparison of free and open-source software licenses. A variety of free-content licences exist, some of them tailored to a specific purpose. Also listed are open-hardware licences, which may be used on design documents of and custom-made software for open-source hardware.

5. Permissive software license - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_software_license

   The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."

6. Copyleft - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft

   Copyleft is a distinguishing feature of some free software licenses, while other free-software licenses are not copyleft licenses because they do not require the licensee to distribute derivative works under the same license. There is an ongoing debate as to which class of license provides the greater degree of freedom.

7. Comparison of anti-plagiarism software - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_anti...

   Submissions are checked against (public) online documents, a (private) shared repository, and the user's own (private) repository. [8] PlagTracker: Devellar 2011 freemium: SaaS: Latin, Cyrillic Rated as "Useless for academic purposes" by Plagiats Portal [9] Turnitin: iParadigms 1997 proprietary: SaaS: Latin & multiple scripts through ...

8. Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Permission...

   It is unique among the OSI's licenses because of the choices it allows in its construction. It lets the licensor pick anywhere from 0-2 warranty disclaimers, whether they want to prohibit the author's name from being used in publicity or advertising surrounding a distribution (like in the BSD License), and other spelling and grammar options.

9. Free license - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_license

   A free license or open license is a license that allows copyrighted work to be reused, modified, and redistributed. These uses are normally prohibited by copyright, patent or other Intellectual property (IP) laws. The term broadly covers free content licenses and open-source licenses, also known as free software licenses.