enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bakke, a 1978 landmark decision, that affirmative action could be used as a determining factor in college admission policy but that the University of California, Davis School of Medicine's racial quota was discriminatory. The Court upheld this case in Grutter v. Bollinger, a 2003 landmark decision.

  3. Schuette v. BAMN - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schuette_v._BAMN

    BAMN, 572 U.S. 291 (2014), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action and race- and sex-based discrimination in public university admissions. In a 6-2 decision, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment 's Equal Protection Clause does not prevent states from enacting bans on affirmative ...

  4. What to Know About the Supreme Court Overturning College ...

    www.aol.com/know-supreme-court-overturning...

    The Supreme Court's recent ruling to overturn affirmative action means that Colleges and universities can no longer consider race in admission policies. Here how the ruling affects students.

  5. What the Supreme Court's ruling on affirmative action means ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-courts-ruling...

    The Supreme Court decided two cases brought by Students for Fair Admissions, a group headed by Edward Blum, a conservative legal strategist who has spent years fighting affirmative action.

  6. Here’s what the Supreme Court’s affirmative action decision ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-affirmative...

    California schools should continue to pursue diversity and look for ways to achieve it that are not ruled out by the Supreme Court’s decision. California schools should continue to pursue ...

  7. Johnson v. Transportation Agency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._Transportation...

    The Supreme Court upheld the Agency's plan by a 6–3 vote. The majority (Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, and Stevens) reviewed the Agency's plan under the test laid out in Weber. [2] First, the voluntary affirmative action plan must be aimed at "eliminat[ing] manifest racial [or gender] imbalances in traditionally segregated job categories."

  8. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regents_of_the_University...

    After twice being rejected by the University of California, Davis, he brought suit in state court challenging the constitutionality of the school's affirmative-action program. The California Supreme Court struck down the program as violative of the rights of white applicants and ordered Bakke admitted. The U.S. Supreme Court accepted the case ...

  9. California voters failed to repeal ban on affirmative action ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-voters-failed-repeal...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us