enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fundamental theorem of calculus for complex analysis, proof

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/958774

    Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

  3. integration - Fundamental theorem of calculus proof? -...

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/666279/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus-proof

    8. To give you background, I have been studying calculus from Stewart. In the Integrals chapter, he proved the Evaluation Therorem by applying the mean value theorem on the Riemann sum of a continous function f f: ∫b a f(x)dx = F(b) − F(a). ∫ a b f (x) d x = F (b) − F (a). Now when I studying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, I think ...

  4. Proof of fundamental lemma of calculus of variation.

    math.stackexchange.com/.../proof-of-fundamental-lemma-of-calculus-of-variation

    My teacher tells me the following statement: Suppose f ∈ L1Loc(Ω) and ∫Ωfφ = 0, ∀φ ∈ C∞0(Ω) Then f = 0 a.e. on Ω. It is known as fundamental lemma of calculus of variation. My teacher told me it suffices to prove this statement holds for the case f is continuous. But I find it's not easy to deduce the lemma from the case f is ...

  5. Here is a problem I have been working on recently: Let f: [a, b] → R be continuous, differentiable on [a, b] except at most for a countable number of points, and f′ is Lebesgue integrable, then the fundamental theorem of calculus holds, i.e. ∀x, y ∈ [a, b] we have f(y) = f(x) + ∫y xf ′ (t)dt. The proof I have at the moment is ...

  6. Proof for the "Fundamental Calculus Theorem" for two variables.

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/2161490/proof-for-the-fundamental-calculus...

    As you have written it F(x, y) = ∫ba∫dcf(u, v)dudv indicates that the function F is a constant with zero partial derivatives since the integral on the RHS is a constant (real number) independent of x and y. Assuming that f ∈ C(R) you can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus twice to prove (*). First you must show that G(u, y) = ∫ ...

  7. Is my proof of second fundamental theorem of calculus (without...

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/3078449/is-my-proof-of-second-fundamental...

    Your proof would be correct, if you can first prove something like the following: ... First Fundamental ...

  8. user friendly proof of fundamental theorem of calculus

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/1261432

    Silly question. Can someone show me a nice easy to follow proof on the fundamental theorem of calculus. More specifically, $\displaystyle\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)$ I know that by just googling fundamental theorem of calculus, one can get all sorts of answers, but for some odd reason I have a hard time following the arguments.

  9. Why does the fundamental theorem of calculus work?

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/1537821

    80. Intuitively, the fundamental theorem of calculus states that "the total change is the sum of all the little changes". f ′ (x)dx is a tiny change in the value of f. You add up all these tiny changes to get the total change f(b) − f(a). In more detail, chop up the interval [a, b] into tiny pieces: a = x0 <x1 <⋯ <xN = b.

  10. real analysis - Proof of second Fundamental theorem of calculus...

    math.stackexchange.com/.../3073386/proof-of-second-fundamental-theorem-of-calculus

    Second fundamental Theorem of Calculus: If f is differentiable on [a, b] and f ′ is integrable on [a, b], then ∫b af ′ (t)dt = f(b) − f(a) My proof. Since f is differentiable on [a,b], then f ′ (t) exists for all t ∈ [a, b]. For each n ∈ N, let Pn be an arbitrary partition such that. a = x0 <x1 <⋯ <xn = b. Since f is ...

  11. real analysis - Proof of first Fundamental theorem of calculus...

    math.stackexchange.com/.../3073225/proof-of-first-fundamental-theorem-of-calculus

    Proof of fundamental theorem of calculus part 1 Rudin Theorem 6.20. 1. Attempt at proving the first part ...