Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is seen in their courtroom at the Justice Building in Raleigh, N.C., Monday, May 9, 2022. ... The law opened a two-year window for victims of child ...
The Supreme Court justices’ ruling on the first and most significant case Wednesday will likely give the final answer on whether the law’s revival window violates the North Carolina State ...
Federal Trade Commission, 574 U.S. 494 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of immunity from US antitrust law. The Supreme Court held that a state occupational licensing board that was primarily composed of persons active in the market it regulates has immunity from antitrust law only when it is actively supervised by the ...
The N.C. Supreme court heard arguments Nov. 1 in the case challenging removal of a downtown Asheville monument honoring a Confederate-era governor.
Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a North Carolina statute that prohibited registered sex offenders from using social media websites was unconstitutional because it violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects freedom of speech.
J. D. B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. 261 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that age and mental status is relevant when determining police custody for Miranda purposes, overturning its prior ruling from seven years before. J.
The N.C. Supreme Court will hear a child sexual assault case filed under the N.C. SAFE Child Act lookback window, bypassing the N.C. Court of Appeals.
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 U.S. 333 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously struck down a North Carolina law prohibiting the sale of apples in closed containers marked with any apple grade other than the United States Department of Agriculture grade.