Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Cute vibrating love egg - Lelo Lyla 2. Most comfortable - Lovense Ferri. 1. Lovense Lush 3 - Best Remote Control Vibrator Overall. Love egg style toy. App-controlled. 3 intensity levels, 10 ...
6. We-Vibe Chorus Couples Vibrator. Best Quiet Remote Control Vibrator • Why We Love It: Remote control option, wearable This high-tech vibrator can be turned on remotely via the app, which ...
The Rumble Pak (Japanese: 振動パック, Hepburn: Shindō Pakku) is a removable device from Nintendo that provides force feedback while playing video games. Games that support the Rumble Pak cause it to vibrate in select situations, such as when firing a weapon or receiving damage, to immerse the player in the game.
This high-tech vibrator can be turned on remotely via the app, which allows the controller to manipulate its dual vibration motors through ten speeds. But it's not just for long-distance couples ...
The controller was bundled with all new systems from launch, until the introduction of the 80 GB (CECHKxx, CECHLxx & CECHMxx) model, which substituted the Sixaxis with the new DualShock 3 which added a vibration feature while retaining the design, features and functionality of the Sixaxis. The Sixaxis controller was later phased out and ...
One of the most common forms of haptic feedback in video games is controller rumble. In 1976, Sega's motorbike game Moto-Cross, [21] also known as Fonz, [22] was the first game to use haptic feedback, causing the handlebars to vibrate during a collision with another vehicle. [23]
Vibration (from Latin vibrāre 'to shake') is a mechanical phenomenon whereby oscillations occur about an equilibrium point.Vibration may be deterministic if the oscillations can be characterised precisely (e.g. the periodic motion of a pendulum), or random if the oscillations can only be analysed statistically (e.g. the movement of a tire on a gravel road).
In 2002, Sony and Microsoft were sued by Immersion for patent infringement for the use of vibration functions in their gaming controllers. [1] Specifically, they were accused of infringing on claims in US Patent 6,424,333 and US Patent 6,275,213 (filed 2000 and 2001 as extensions of US Patent 6,088,017, itself filed 1998, all "Tactile feedback man-machine interface device"). [2]