Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Citing inadequacies with current practices in listing authors of papers in medical research journals, Drummond Rennie and co-authors, writing in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 1997, called for: a radical conceptual and systematic change, to reflect the realities of multiple authorship and to buttress accountability.
Rules for the order of multiple authors in a list have historically varied significantly between fields of research. [33] Some fields list authors in order of their degree of involvement in the work, with the most active contributors listed first; [10] other fields, such as mathematics or engineering, sometimes list them alphabetically.
This information can be used to train a machine learning classifier to decide whether two author mentions refer to the same author or not. [6] Much research regards name disambiguation as a clustering problem, i.e., partitioning documents into clusters, where each represents an author. [2] [7] [8] Other research treats it as a classification ...
The definite or indefinite article is sometimes included in the official title of literary works as well as other kinds of fiction and non-fiction publications and works such as newspapers, films and visual artworks. In this case, the article should be included in the name of the corresponding Wikipedia article as well. For example,
When there are multiple names for a subject, all of which are fairly common, and the most common has problems, it is perfectly reasonable to choose one of the others. Although official, scientific, birth, original, or trademarked names are often used for article titles, the term or name most typically used in reliable sources is generally ...
This advice especially applies to article titles. Although multiple terms may be in common usage, a single name should be chosen as the article title, in line with the article titling policy (and relevant guidelines such as on geographical names). Article titles that combine alternative names are discouraged.
For two authors, use (Smith & Jones 2005); for more authors, use (Smith et al. 2005). If the "References" section contains two or more works by the same author but published the same year, use a letter after the year to distinguish the different sources (for example, (Smith 2005a) and (Smith 2005b).
A and B, therefore C" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published this argument in relation to the topic of the article. Here is an example from a Wikipedia article, with the names changed. The article was about Jones: Smith says that Jones committed plagiarism by copying references from another book. Jones denies this, and says it's ...