Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Citing inadequacies with current practices in listing authors of papers in medical research journals, Drummond Rennie and co-authors, writing in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 1997, called for: a radical conceptual and systematic change, to reflect the realities of multiple authorship and to buttress accountability.
Rules for the order of multiple authors in a list have historically varied significantly between fields of research. [33] Some fields list authors in order of their degree of involvement in the work, with the most active contributors listed first; [10] other fields, such as mathematics or engineering, sometimes list them alphabetically.
An article about a novel: The novel itself is an acceptable primary source for information about the plot, the names of the characters, the number of chapters, or other contents in the book: Any educated person can read Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice and discover that the main character's name is Elizabeth or that there are 61 chapters. It ...
This information can be used to train a machine learning classifier to decide whether two author mentions refer to the same author or not. [6] Much research regards name disambiguation as a clustering problem, i.e., partitioning documents into clusters, where each represents an author. [2] [7] [8] Other research treats it as a classification ...
A and B, therefore C" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published this argument in relation to the topic of the article. Here is an example from a Wikipedia article, with the names changed. The article was about Jones: Smith says that Jones committed plagiarism by copying references from another book. Jones denies this, and says it's ...
The author is an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications, except for exceptional claims. [4] Take care when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else will probably have done so.
For two authors, use (Smith & Jones 2005); for more authors, use (Smith et al. 2005). If the "References" section contains two or more works by the same author but published the same year, use a letter after the year to distinguish the different sources (for example, (Smith 2005a) and (Smith 2005b).
If the cumulative reference list of an author's oeuvre is determined as the multiset union of the documents that the author has co-authored, then the author bibliographic coupling strength of two authors (or more precisely, of their oeuvres) is defined as the size of the multiset intersection of their cumulative reference lists, however. [2]