enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Michael H. v. Gerald D. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_H._v._Gerald_D.

    Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving substantive due process in the context of paternity law.

  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v...

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]

  4. Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Reciprocal...

    The Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), passed in 1950, concerns interstate cooperation in the collection of spousal and child support. [1] The law establishes procedures for enforcement in cases in which the person owing alimony or child support is in one state and the person to whom the support is owed is in another state (hence the word "reciprocal").

  5. Category:California state case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:California_state...

    Search. Search. Appearance. Donate; ... Supreme Court of California case law (1 C, 52 P) Pages in category "California state case law"

  6. Paternity law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_law

    If parents litigate a divorce case without raising the issue of paternity, in most states they will be barred from disputing the husband's paternity in a later court proceeding. Depending upon state law, it may nonetheless be possible for a man claiming to be the child's biological father to commence a paternity case following the divorce. [9]

  7. Recognition (family law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recognition_(family_law)

    The statement necessary to establish paternity may be submitted by a person if they are at least 16 years of age and there are no grounds for legal incapacitation. If a man having recognised paternity does not have full legal capacity, he may make a statement necessary for the recognition of paternity only before a court guardianship.

  8. Daniel Calabretta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Calabretta

    Calabretta served as a law clerk for Judge William A. Fletcher of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 2003 to 2004 and Associate Justice John Paul Stevens of the United States Supreme Court from 2004 to 2005. From 2005 to 2008, he was an associate at Munger, Tolles and Olson.

  9. Lockyer v. Andrade - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockyer_v._Andrade

    Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), [1] decided the same day as Ewing v. California (a case with a similar subject matter), [2] held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments.