Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In United States trademark law, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, 537 F.2d 4 (2nd Cir. 1976) [1] established the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness in the US, breaking trademarks into classes which are accorded differing degrees of protection.
In United States trademark law, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World 537 F.2d 4 (2nd Cir. 1976) established the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness in the US, breaking trademarks into classes which are accorded differing degrees of protection.
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. L & L Wings, Inc. 962 F.2d 316 (4th Cir. 1992) Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World 537 F.2d 4 (2nd Cir. 1976) (established the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness in the United States, breaking trademarks into classes which are accorded differing degrees of protection) Aycock Engineering v.
A former Abercrombie & Fitch employee speaks about the narrow image of masculinity the company sold and the toll it took on him and other Asian American men.
Template:Abercrombie & Fitch; Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc. History of Abercrombie & Fitch; E. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie ...
In 1978, Oshman's purchased the rights to the trade name of Abercrombie and Fitch from First National Bank of Chicago for $1.5 million [6] ($5.2 million in 2013 dollars). [7] At the time, Abercrombie and Fitch had filed bankruptcy and was a brand that sold lavish items along with fishing and hunting gear. [ 8 ]
By 2006, Abercrombie & Fitch’s earnings had risen for 52 straight quarters, with annual profits of more than $2 billion. Plus, the company had opened hundreds of new brick-and-mortar stores and ...
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code