Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
If you find any other pages which contained detailed debates on whether or not to delete an article, please link them here. If a page is to be deleted and it was debated on the talk page, move the debate to a separate page called [[Talk:NAME OF ARTICLE/deletion]] and store that delete debate record here to preserve a record of past wiki debates.
Discussions are only listed here when it's removed from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old.See Wikipedia:Deletion process for the preferred process for storing deletion discussions.
Deletionpedia was an online archive wiki containing articles deleted from the English Wikipedia. Its version of each article included a header with more information about the deletion such as whether a speedy deletion occurred, where the deletion discussion about the article can be found and which editor deleted the article.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
Please userfy the talk page (the AfD-deleted article without the talk page has already been userfied to another editor, who has started a new talk page), because the AfD process indicated that questions may arise about my editing and behavior (I was the most frequent editor) and in responding to that people will need access to the talk page and ...
The ones near the bottom from Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation were only proposed articles, not real articles. Anything that is promotional should not be preserved here when it's been deleted to get it out of the encyclopedia (eg, "File:Singh Rashmi's book The Fallen Love release at WORLD BOOK FAIR 2012 PUBLISHED BY PIGEON BOOKS NEW DELHI ...
There's also the super-secret User:SDZeroBot/PROD grid which stores snippets of PRODed articles, so that even after articles get deleted, non-admins can still use the page history to access the snippets, which should be enough to get the context of what an article was about. It does not however store the sources used, which may have been useful.
No. I am not talking about using the Internet Archive for citations (e.g. the Wayback Machine). I am talking about the Wikipedia article on the Internet Archive. The reason why you might find my missing the point is that you're on the wrong page for the discussion that you're trying to have. This is the Talk page for the article.