enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Frame problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_problem

    The frame problem can be thought of as the problem of formalizing the principle that, by default, "everything is presumed to remain in the state in which it is" (Leibniz, "An Introduction to a Secret Encyclopædia", c. 1679).

  3. Fluent calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluent_calculus

    The fluent calculus is a formalism for expressing dynamical domains in first-order logic.It is a variant of the situation calculus; the main difference is that situations are considered representations of states.

  4. Fluent (artificial intelligence) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluent_(artificial...

    This representation of fluents is used in the event calculus, in the fluent calculus, and in the features and fluents logics. Some fluents can be represented as functions in a different way. For example, the position of a box can be represented by a function o n ( b o x , t ) {\displaystyle on(box,t)} whose value is the object the box is ...

  5. Event calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_calculus

    The event calculus was developed in part as an alternative to the situation calculus, [6] [7] as a solution to the frame problem, of representing and reasoning about the way in which actions and other events change the state of some world. There are many variants of the event calculus.

  6. Talk:Frame problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Frame_problem

    The name "frame problem" has been at some point used to indicate more generally the problem of "formalizing domains with actions in logic", but I think this use is obsolete now. Regarding inertia, this was the initial assmption in the original problem; there are however some logics where fluents can be specified not to be inertial.

  7. Situation calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situation_calculus

    The version of the situation calculus introduced by McCarthy in 1986 differs to the original one by the use of functional fluents (e.g., (,) is a term representing the position of x in the situation s) and for an attempt to use circumscription to replace the frame axioms.

  8. Fluxion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluxion

    If the fluent ⁠ ⁠ is defined as = (where ⁠ ⁠ is time) the fluxion (derivative) at = is: ˙ = = (+) (+) = + + + = + Here ⁠ ⁠ is an infinitely small amount of time. [6] So, the term ⁠ ⁠ is second order infinite small term and according to Newton, we can now ignore ⁠ ⁠ because of its second order infinite smallness comparing to first order infinite smallness of ⁠ ⁠. [7]

  9. Fluent Design System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluent_Design_System

    Fluent Design System (codenamed "Project Neon"), [11] officially unveiled as Microsoft Fluent Design System, [12] is a design language developed in 2017 by Microsoft.Fluent Design is a revamp of Microsoft Design Language 2 (sometimes erroneously known as "Metro", the codename of Microsoft Design Language 1) that includes guidelines for the designs and interactions used within software designed ...