Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Legal syllogism is a legal concept concerning the law and its application, specifically a form of argument based on deductive reasoning and seeking to establish whether a specified act is lawful. [1] A syllogism is a form of logical reasoning that hinges on a question, a major premise, a minor premise and a conclusion.
Commutativity of conjunction can be expressed in sequent notation as: ()and ()where is a metalogical symbol meaning that () is a syntactic consequence of (), in the one case, and () is a syntactic consequence of () in the other, in some logical system;
The name "disjunctive syllogism" derives from its being a syllogism, a three-step argument, and the use of a logical disjunction (any "or" statement.) For example, "P or Q" is a disjunction, where P and Q are called the statement's disjuncts. The rule makes it possible to eliminate a disjunction from a logical proof. It is the rule that
A law review or law journal is a scholarly journal or publication that focuses on legal issues. [1] A law review is a type of legal periodical. [2] Law reviews are a source of research, imbedded with analyzed and referenced legal topics; they also provide a scholarly analysis of emerging legal concepts from various topics.
Stanford Law Review. 65: 1203 et seq. JSTOR 23528250. Frankel, Alison (January 9, 2013). "Supreme Court Declines to Halt 2nd Circuit's Twiqbal Pushback". Reuters. Archived from the original on 14 Jan 2013. Janssen, William M (2013). "The Odd State of Twiqbal Plausibility in Pleading Affirmative Defenses". Washington and Lee Law Review. 70 (3 ...
In the common law, an answer is the first pleading by a defendant, usually filed and served upon the plaintiff within a certain strict time limit after a civil complaint or criminal information or indictment has been served upon the defendant.
The purposive approach (sometimes referred to as purposivism, [1] purposive construction, [2] purposive interpretation, [3] or the modern principle in construction) [4] is an approach to statutory and constitutional interpretation under which common law courts interpret an enactment (a statute, part of a statute, or a clause of a constitution) within the context of the law's purpose.
In regards to contract law, arguing in the alternative is done where a dispute arises over the terms of a contract. In a particular case it may be best for the plaintiff to allege that a statement made was to become a term of the contract. However the circumstances of the case may be such that the plaintiff cannot be certain that the court will ...