Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The most common type of bankruptcy, a chapter 7 filing involves liquidating — or selling — your assets to pay off your creditors and debts. Chapter 13 bankruptcy.
Court filing fees: The standard filing fee for a Chapter 13 bankruptcy is $313. Post-filing debtor education: A debtor education course is also mandatory after filing, and fees generally range ...
When you file for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, you will need to attend credit counseling. Your credit counselor will go over your options and help create a plan. Your credit counselor will ...
The rules for filing personal bankruptcy in each province and territory differ slightly. In some areas of Canada individuals may be permitted to keep (exempt) certain property. Common items for exemption include clothing, furniture, appliances, motor vehicles, medical and dental aids, a home, family heirlooms , and some insurance.
The disadvantage of filing for personal bankruptcy is that, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a record of this stays on the individual's credit report for up to 7 years (up to 10 years for Chapter 7); [5] still, it is possible to obtain new debt or credit (cards, auto, or consumer loans) after only 12–24 months, and a new FHA mortgage loan just 25 months after discharge, and Fannie Mae ...
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) (Pub. L. 109–8 (text), 119 Stat. 23, enacted April 20, 2005) is a legislative act that made several significant changes to the United States Bankruptcy Code.
Image source: Getty Images. For many years, I was a bankruptcy lawyer. As opposed to when I practiced litigation (suing people and defending lawsuits), bankruptcy was a dream practice.
The first municipal bankruptcy legislation was enacted in 1934 during the Great Depression. [2] Although Congress attempted to draft the legislation so as not to interfere with the sovereign powers of the states guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, the Supreme Court held the 1934 Act unconstitutional as an improper interference with the sovereignty of the states. [2]