enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepika_Singh_v._Central...

    Atypical families are deserving of equal protection under law and benefits available under social welfare legislation. Decision by. D. Y. Chandrachud and A. S. Bopanna. Deepika Singh versus Central Administrative Tribunal & Ors. (2022) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that widens the definition of 'family' under Indian law.

  3. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navtej_Singh_Johar_v...

    Keywords. Criminalization of Homosexuality, Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation. Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (2018) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalised all consensual sex among adults, including homosexual sex. [1]

  4. Supriyo v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supriyo_v._Union_of_India

    Supriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang v. Union of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & other connected cases (2023) are a collection of landmark cases of the Supreme Court of India, which were filed to consider whether to extend right to marry and establish a family to sexual and gender minority individuals in India. [4]

  5. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janhit_Abhiyan_v._Union_of...

    Judges sitting. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit (CJI), Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Justice Bela M Trivedi, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice Shripathi Ravindra Bhat. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 55 OF 2019), also known as the EWS Reservation case, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India.

  6. Mohammad Salimullah v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Salimullah_v...

    Union of India (Writ Petition (Civil) 793 of 2017), is a petition challenging the deportation of Rohingya Muslims who had taken refuge in India to escape persecution in Myanmar. The court however, in an interim order rejected any relief and allowed their deportation subject to proper procedure being followed. [1][2]

  7. Indian Kanoon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Kanoon

    Indian Kanoon. URL. indiankanoon.org. Launched. 2008; 16 years ago (2008) Current status. Online. Indian Kanoon is an Indian law search engine. [1][2] It was launched on 4 January 2008. The search engine has been meshed with the highest courts and tribunals of India to provide up-to-date judgements. [3][4]

  8. Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_NCT_of_Delhi...

    Union of India. Government of NCT of Delhi versus Union of India & Another [C. A. No. 2357 of 2017] is a civil appeal heard before the Supreme Court of India by a five-judge constitution bench of the court. The case was filed as an appeal to an August 2016 verdict of the Delhi High Court that ruled that the lieutenant governor of Delhi ...

  9. Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_420_of_the_Indian...

    In the Nigerian Criminal Code, the same offence is covered by article 419, which has now lent its name to the advance fee fraud. [6] The title of two popular Hindi films – Chachi 420 (in English: Trickster Aunt, a 1997 remake of Mrs. Doubtfire) and Shri 420 (in English: Mr. 420, a 1955 film) – are direct references to Section 420 of the IPC.