Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Oxford Research Encyclopedias (OREs), which includes 25 encyclopedias in different areas, is an encyclopedic collection published by Oxford University Press in print and online. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Its website was entirely free during an initial development period of several years.
Online encyclopedia of traditional Swiss cuisine and produce. [15] Free DEDI: English, Slovene: Online encyclopedia of the natural and cultural heritage of Slovenia, operated by the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts Scientific Research Center. [16] Free Dictionary of Sydney: English Articles on the history and culture of Sydney, Australia ...
Oxford Bibliographies Online launched in 2010 following 18 months of research by Oxford University Press (OUP) on the way students and scholars accessed information. [1] According to OUP, learning on a new topic was often hampered and confused by an overabundance of information that left people without a clear starting point.
The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) is the principal historical dictionary of the English language, published by Oxford University Press (OUP), a University of Oxford publishing house. The dictionary, which published its first edition in 1884, traces the historical development of the English language, providing a comprehensive resource to ...
The fourth edition and the third revised edition of the OCD are available online for members of subscribed institutions and for subscribed individuals via Oxford Reference. [7] The third edition (1996) was also available on CD-ROM , but it is partially incompatible with more recent versions of Windows and has not been revised or re-released.
Oxford Encyclopedia (1828) (Link contains Vols. 4 and 5) London Encyclopaedia (1829) Encyclopaedia Americana (1829–1833), 13 volumes, editor Francis Lieber.
Discover the best free online games at AOL.com - Play board, card, casino, puzzle and many more online games while chatting with others in real-time.
[1] [2] A review in the Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature asked why Oxford University Press needed to publish the encyclopedia, noting that it duplicated efforts of many other works. The review opined that it failed to "catalyze research" and engages in "opinion mongering and a curious myopia about experimental writing."