enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Legality of recording by civilians - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_recording_by...

   The legality of recording by civilians refers to laws regarding the recording of other persons and property by civilians through the means of still photography, videography, and audio recording in various locations. Although it is common for the recording of public property, persons within the public domain, and of private property visible or ...

3. Video Privacy Protection Act - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Privacy_Protection_Act

   In 2013, the law was amended to add provisions allowing consumers to electronically consent to sharing video rental histories and to extend the time that consent can last to up to two years. [4] The law became a focus of attention in the legal industry once again in the twenty-first century with the rise of audiovisual content sharing through ...

4. Telephone call recording laws - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws

   Germany is a two-party consent jurisdiction—telephone recording without the consent of the two or, when applicable, more, parties is a criminal offence according to § 201 of the German Criminal Code [9] —violation of the confidentiality of the spoken word. Telephone tapping by authorities has to be approved by a judge.

5. Photography and the law - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography_and_the_law

   The IAC, Film and Video Institute recommends that one follows instruction given by police as there may be a reason/reasons for not filming, ignorance of said law(s) notwithstanding. [6] An exception is an area that has prohibitions detailed within anti terrorism legislation. Civil proceeding can be taken if a person is filmed without consent ...

6. Glik v. Cunniffe - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glik_v._Cunniffe

   Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights.

7. Illinois wiretapping law - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_wiretapping_law

   Illinois made it a crime to use an "eavesdropping device" to overhear or record a phone call or conversation without the consent of all parties to the conversation. The law was ruled unconstitutional in 2014 by the Illinois Supreme Court , but was replaced by a near-identical law later that same year.