Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The begging the question fallacy occurs when an argument’s premise relies on the conclusion. You can identify this fallacy because the premise usually just re-states the conclusion rather than supporting it. It’s related to the circular reasoning fallacy.
A begging the question fallacy occurs when the argument's conclusion is assumed in its premise. In other words, it's a form of circular reasoning where the thing you're trying to prove is already assumed to be true.
Begging the question fallacy occurs when we use the claim we are trying to prove as a premise in order to prove the very same claim. In other words, we assume that a premise is true in order to justify an argument.
Begging the Question (literal translation from latin petitio principii) is a logical fallacy where the premise on which the conclusion is based, is already assumed to be true. This allows one to make an argument without sufficient evidence.
The “begging the question” fallacy, then, is an informal fallacy because a statement that begs the question isn’t necessarily untrue, it’s just not persuasive. Examples of Begging the Question. Does that all sound vague and a bit confusing? Let’s look at some examples to help clear things up.
Begging the Question is the most basic and classic example of a Fallacy of Presumption. Discover an explanation of the phenomenon plus see examples.
In classical rhetoric and logic, begging the question or assuming the conclusion (Latin: petītiō principiī) is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion.
Examples of begging the question. An example of an argument that begs the question is “this company makes the best computers, because no other company makes computers that are as good”, since the premise and conclusion of the argument are functionally equivalent, and are just phrased differently.
The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question.
The Begging the Question fallacy is a type of logical fallacy that occurs when an argument’s conclusion is assumed by the premises. In other words, the conclusion is contained within the argument itself and is simply being restated.