Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fundamental errors are both plain errors and reversible errors. Fundamental errors are similar to substantial errors; however, the definition of a "substantial error" may differ slightly among the courts.
Several theories predict the fundamental attribution error, and thus both compete to explain it, and can be falsified if it does not occur. Some examples include:
Additionally, there are many different types of attribution biases, such as the ultimate attribution error, fundamental attribution error, actor-observer bias, and hostile attribution bias. Each of these biases describes a specific tendency that people exhibit when reasoning about the cause of different behaviors. [3]
[citation needed] One must first distinguish between mechanical calculations and business errors when looking at unilateral mistake. [citation needed] Ordinarily, unilateral mistake does not make a contract void. [8] Traditionally this is caveat emptor (let the buyer beware), and under common law caveat venditor (let the seller beware).
The writ is allowed only under compelling circumstances to achieve justice and to address errors of the most fundamental nature. A writ of coram nobis is available to address certain errors of the most fundamental nature that are found in one of four categories: Insanity at the time of trial, A coerced guilty plea,
Ross first came into prominence in 1977 when he coined the term "fundamental attribution error" to describe the finding that people are predisposed towards attributing another person's behavior to individual characteristics and attitudes, even when it is relatively clear that the person's behavior was a result of situational demands (Ross, 1977 ...
Explaining away positive behavior in outgroup members. In the case of negative attribution of outgroup member's positive behaviours, four categories were proposed.
This law -related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.