enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Coordinating Ministry for Legal, Human Rights, Immigration ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinating_Ministry_for...

    In 2001–2004, this ministry was known as the Department of Law and Legislation (Departemen Hukum dan Perundang-undangan). From 2004–2009, this ministry was known as the Department of Law and Human Rights ( Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia ).

  3. National Commission on Human Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Commission_on...

    The commission was established by the Suharto regime through a Presidential Decree No. 50 of 1993, shortly after United Nations Commission on Human Rights resolution 1993/97 expressed grave concern over allegations of serious human rights violations by the government of Indonesia. [1] Komnas HAM's jurisdiction included human rights issues in ...

  4. Proposal 2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposal_2

    In 2004, Proposal 2 was Michigan State Proposal – 04-2 (2004), which aimed to define marriage as "the union of one man and one woman" in the state constitution; In 2006, Proposal 2 was the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, which banned affirmative action in public education

  5. 2022 Michigan Proposal 2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Michigan_Proposal_2

    2022 Michigan Proposal 2, the Right to Voting Policies Amendment, and also known as Promote the Vote, was a citizen-initiated proposed constitutional amendment in the state of Michigan, which was voted on as part of the 2022 Michigan elections. The amendment changed voting procedures in the state with the goal of making it easier to vote.

  6. 2022 Michigan Proposal 3 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Michigan_Proposal_3

    On August 31, the Board of State Canvassers, responsible for determining whether candidates and initiatives should be placed on the ballot, deadlocked 22, with challengers arguing that the initiative's wording was poorly spaced. On September 9, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that the initiative should be placed on the November ballot. [3]