Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Statistical significance test: A predecessor to the statistical hypothesis test (see the Origins section). An experimental result was said to be statistically significant if a sample was sufficiently inconsistent with the (null) hypothesis. This was variously considered common sense, a pragmatic heuristic for identifying meaningful experimental ...
The term significance does not imply importance here, and the term statistical significance is not the same as research significance, theoretical significance, or practical significance. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 18 ] [ 19 ] For example, the term clinical significance refers to the practical importance of a treatment effect.
The problem of multiple comparisons received increased attention in the 1950s with the work of statisticians such as Tukey and Scheffé. Over the ensuing decades, many procedures were developed to address the problem. In 1996, the first international conference on multiple comparison procedures took place in Tel Aviv. [3]
The difference between the two sample means, each denoted by X i, which appears in the numerator for all the two-sample testing approaches discussed above, is ¯ ¯ = The sample standard deviations for the two samples are approximately 0.05 and 0.11, respectively. For such small samples, a test of equality between the two population variances ...
In 1928, Jerzy Neyman (1894–1981) and Egon Pearson (1895–1980), both eminent statisticians, discussed the problems associated with "deciding whether or not a particular sample may be judged as likely to have been randomly drawn from a certain population": [7] and, as Florence Nightingale David remarked, "it is necessary to remember the ...
The specific problem is: ... (significance) test is a ... as close as desired to the chi-squared distribution with 5 degrees of freedom by making the sample size n ...
A statistical significance test starts with a random sample from a population. If the sample data are consistent with the null hypothesis, then you do not reject the null hypothesis; if the sample data are inconsistent with the null hypothesis, then you reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the alternative hypothesis is true. [3]
This would have and would be significant (rejecting the null hypothesis) if the test was analyzed at a significance level of = (the significance level corresponding to the cutoff bound). However, if testing for whether the coin is biased towards heads or tails, a two-tailed test would be used, and a data set of five heads (sample mean 1) is as ...