Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In experimental psychology, the RMSD is used to assess how well mathematical or computational models of behavior explain the empirically observed behavior. In GIS, the RMSD is one measure used to assess the accuracy of spatial analysis and remote sensing. In hydrogeology, RMSD and NRMSD are used to evaluate the calibration of a groundwater ...
Typically RMSD is used as a quantitative measure of similarity between two or more protein structures. For example, the CASP protein structure prediction competition uses RMSD as one of its assessments of how well a submitted structure matches the known, target structure. Thus the lower RMSD, the better the model is in comparison to the target ...
The MSE either assesses the quality of a predictor (i.e., a function mapping arbitrary inputs to a sample of values of some random variable), or of an estimator (i.e., a mathematical function mapping a sample of data to an estimate of a parameter of the population from which the data is sampled).
Let P and Q be two sets, each containing N points in .We want to find the transformation from Q to P.For simplicity, we will consider the three-dimensional case (=).The sets P and Q can each be represented by N × 3 matrices with the first row containing the coordinates of the first point, the second row containing the coordinates of the second point, and so on, as shown in this matrix:
The same principle applies, and (for example) a current of 10 amps used for 12 hours each 24-hour day represents an average current of 5 amps, but an RMS current of 7.07 amps, in the long term. The term RMS power is sometimes erroneously used (e.g., in the audio industry) as a synonym for mean power or average power (it is proportional to the ...
The data set [1, 5, 6, 8, 10, 40, 65, 88] has still more variability. Its standard deviation is 32.9 and its average is 27.9, giving a coefficient of variation of 32.9 / 27.9 = 1.18; In these examples, we will take the values given as the entire population of values.
Generally scores below 0.20 corresponds to randomly chosen unrelated proteins whereas structures with a score higher than 0.5 assume roughly the same fold. [2] A quantitative study [ 3 ] shows that proteins of TM-score = 0.5 have a posterior probability of 37% in the same CATH topology family and of 13% in the same SCOP fold family.
It seems that there is an ambiguity on whether the article is about (1) the RMSE of an estimator, which is an expected value and thus a fixed number or (2) the RMSE of a particular sample (which is a random number in the sense that it depends upon the actual sample obtained).