enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

  3. Comparative negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_negligence

    Comparative negligence, called non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury.

  4. California Codes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Codes

    Yellow Cab Co., the Supreme Court acknowledged the Legislature's original intent in enacting Civil Code section 1714 [14] to codify a contributory negligence scheme subject to the last clear chance doctrine, then held the legislature had not intended to freeze the common law in place and proceeded to judicially adopt comparative negligence. In ...

  5. Supreme Court of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_California

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975): [55] The Court embraced comparative negligence as part of California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976): [56] The Court held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a ...

  6. Lies and Medical Care: Comparative Negligence and ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/lies-medical-care-comparative...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Hoffman v. Jones - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoffman_v._Jones

    The Florida Supreme Court adopted the concept of "pure" comparative negligence, which allows a victim to be compensated for the percentage of harm caused by the at-fault person. The decision of the court in Hoffman v. Jones has been cited in law school textbooks, and now the concept of comparative negligence is the prevailing doctrine.

  8. GSK settles two California lawsuits related to heartburn drug ...

    www.aol.com/news/gsk-settles-two-california...

    The drugmaker has settled a series of lawsuits related to Zantac over the past 12 months, including several in California. California is generally seen as a more challenging legal environment for ...

  9. Law of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_California

    Bernard Witkin's Summary of California Law, a legal treatise popular with California judges and lawyers. The Constitution of California is the foremost source of state law. . Legislation is enacted within the California Statutes, which in turn have been codified into the 29 California Co