enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. HMAC-based one-time password - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMAC-based_one-time_password

    HMAC-based one-time password (HOTP) is a one-time password (OTP) algorithm based on HMAC. It is a cornerstone of the Initiative for Open Authentication (OATH). HOTP was published as an informational IETF RFC 4226 in December 2005, documenting the algorithm along with a Java implementation. Since then, the algorithm has been adopted by many ...

  3. HMAC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMAC

    For example, SHA-256 operates on 512-bit blocks. The size of the output of HMAC is the same as that of the underlying hash function (e.g., 256 and 512 bits in the case of SHA-256 and SHA3-512, respectively), although it can be truncated if desired. HMAC does not encrypt the message.

  4. HKDF - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HKDF

    HKDF-Expand takes the PRK, some "info", and a length, and generates output of the desired length. HKDF-Expand acts as a pseudorandom function keyed on PRK. This means that multiple outputs can be generated from a single IKM value by using different values for the "info" field.

  5. Message authentication code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_authentication_code

    [3] Formally, a message authentication code (MAC) system is a triple of efficient [4] algorithms (G, S, V) satisfying: G (key-generator) gives the key k on input 1 n, where n is the security parameter. S (signing) outputs a tag t on the key k and the input string x. V (verifying) outputs accepted or rejected on inputs: the key k, the string x ...

  6. PBKDF2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBKDF2

    A Kerberos standard in 2005 recommended 4,096 iterations; [1] Apple reportedly used 2,000 for iOS 3, and 10,000 for iOS 4; [4] while LastPass in 2011 used 5,000 iterations for JavaScript clients and 100,000 iterations for server-side hashing. [5] In 2023, OWASP recommended to use 600,000 iterations for PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 and 210,000 for PBKDF2 ...

  7. Length extension attack - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_extension_attack

    [1] [2] [3] Truncated versions of SHA-2, including SHA-384 and SHA-512/256 are not susceptible, [4] nor is the SHA-3 algorithm. [5] HMAC also uses a different construction and so is not vulnerable to length extension attacks. [6] Lastly, just performing Hash(message ‖ secret) is enough to not be affected. [citation needed]

  8. Whirlpool (hash function) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whirlpool_(hash_function)

    Research on the security analysis of the Whirlpool function however, has revealed that on average, the introduction of 8 random faults is sufficient to compromise the 512-bit Whirlpool hash message being processed and the secret key of HMAC-Whirlpool within the context of Cloud of Things (CoTs).

  9. SHA-3 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-3

    SHA-3 (Secure Hash Algorithm 3) is the latest [4] member of the Secure Hash Algorithm family of standards, released by NIST on August 5, 2015. [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] Although part of the same series of standards, SHA-3 is internally different from the MD5 -like structure of SHA-1 and SHA-2 .