Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The above is obtained using a second order approximation, following the method used in estimating the first moment. It will be a poor approximation in cases where () is highly non-linear. This is a special case of the delta method.
This algorithm can easily be adapted to compute the variance of a finite population: simply divide by n instead of n − 1 on the last line.. Because SumSq and (Sum×Sum)/n can be very similar numbers, cancellation can lead to the precision of the result to be much less than the inherent precision of the floating-point arithmetic used to perform the computation.
Example 3: Bounded normal mean: When estimating the mean of a normal vector (,), where it is known that ‖ ‖. The Bayes estimator with respect to a prior which is uniformly distributed on the edge of the bounding sphere is known to be minimax whenever M ≤ n {\displaystyle M\leq n\,\!} .
By the Central Limit Theorem, as n increases, the Irwin–Hall distribution more and more strongly approximates a Normal distribution with mean = / and variance = /.To approximate the standard Normal distribution () = (=, =), the Irwin–Hall distribution can be centered by shifting it by its mean of n/2, and scaling the result by the square root of its variance:
In mathematics, a linear approximation is an approximation of a general function using a linear function (more precisely, an affine function). They are widely used in the method of finite differences to produce first order methods for solving or approximating solutions to equations.
What is meant by best and simpler will depend on the application. A closely related topic is the approximation of functions by generalized Fourier series, that is, approximations based upon summation of a series of terms based upon orthogonal polynomials.
A minimax approximation algorithm ... given a function ... The Weierstrass approximation theorem states that every continuous function defined on a closed interval ...
When g is applied to a random variable such as the mean, the delta method would tend to work better as the sample size increases, since it would help reduce the variance, and thus the taylor approximation would be applied to a smaller range of the function g at the point of interest.