Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[1] [2] Every positive integer is composite, prime, or the unit 1, so the composite numbers are exactly the numbers that are not prime and not a unit. [3] [4] E.g., the integer 14 is a composite number because it is the product of the two smaller integers 2 × 7 but the integers 2 and 3 are not because each can only be divided by one and itself ...
Highly composite numbers greater than 6 are also abundant numbers. One need only look at the three largest proper divisors of a particular highly composite number to ascertain this fact. It is false that all highly composite numbers are also Harshad numbers in base 10. The first highly composite number that is not a Harshad number is ...
a composite number has more than just 1 and itself as divisors; that is, d(n) > 2; a highly composite number has a number of positive divisors that is greater than any lesser number; that is, d(n) > d(m) for every positive integer m < n. Counterintuitively, the first two highly composite numbers are not composite numbers.
Divisor function d(n) up to n = 250 Prime-power factors. In number theory, a superior highly composite number is a natural number which, in a particular rigorous sense, has many divisors. Particularly, it is defined by a ratio between the number of divisors an integer has and that integer raised to some positive power.
2.50 Prime quadruplets. 2.51 ... other value will always result in a composite number. 294001, 505447 ... 2) (in German) (Lists Wieferich primes in all bases up to ...
The table is complete up to the maximum norm at the end of the table in the sense that each composite or prime in the first quadrant appears in the second column. Gaussian primes occur only for a subset of norms, detailed in sequence OEIS: A055025. This here is a composition of sequences OEIS: A103431 and OEIS: A103432.
Euler's proof of the zeta product formula contains a version of the sieve of Eratosthenes in which each composite number is eliminated exactly once. [9] The same sieve was rediscovered and observed to take linear time by Gries & Misra (1978). [19] It, too, starts with a list of numbers from 2 to n in order. On each step the first element is ...
In-between these two conditions lies the definition of Carmichael number of order m for any positive integer m as any composite number n such that p n is an endomorphism on every Z n-algebra that can be generated as Z n-module by m elements. Carmichael numbers of order 1 are just the ordinary Carmichael numbers.