enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Parker v. Brown - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_v._Brown

    Parker v. Brown , 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law . It held that actions taken by state governments were exempt from the scope of the Sherman Act .

  3. Parker immunity doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_immunity_doctrine

    The Parker immunity doctrine is an exemption from liability for engaging in antitrust violations. It applies to the state when it exercises legislative authority in creating a regulation with anticompetitive effects, and to private actors when they act at the direction of the state after it has done so.

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Stone Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Williams et al. v. State of North Carolina: 317 U.S. 287 (1942) Divorce and marriage recognition between states Parker v. Brown: 317 U.S. 341 (1943) Parker immunity doctrine in United States antitrust law: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States: 318 U.S. 363 (1943) Negotiable instruments, Federal common law: Largent v. State of Texas: 318 U.S ...

  5. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_State_Board...

    To address this, the Court in Parker v. Brown (1943) granted California immunity from federal antitrust laws after the state created a New Deal raisin cartel. Statehouses happily delegated Parker immunity to trade associations and when attorneys began using this delegation to set a price floor the Court in Goldfarb v.

  6. Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldfarb_v._Virginia_State_Bar

    Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar , 421 U.S. 773 (1975), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision. It stated that lawyers engage in "trade or commerce" and hence ended the legal profession's exemption from antitrust laws.

  7. After wait, physical therapy fraud case advances in Erie ...

    www.aol.com/wait-physical-therapy-fraud-case...

    The FBI and other law enforcement agencies parked vans outside the then-main office of Hertel & Brown Physical & Aquatic Therapy in the West Erie Plaza in Millcreek Township on Feb. 23, 2021.

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Standard for summary judgment: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett: 477 U.S. 317 (1986) Standard for summary judgment Ford v. Wainwright: 477 U.S. 399 (1986) Competence to be executed Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court: 478 U.S. 1 (1986) First Amendment free press guarantee and the right to a transcript of a preliminary hearing Bowers v. Hardwick: 478 ...

  9. The purposeful murder charge, however, did require proof of intent on Brown's part. "This is a very interesting legal issue," Leuthold said. Case law after previous strangulation rulings, Leuthold ...