enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Encino Motorcars v. Navarro - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encino_Motorcars_v._Navarro

    Encino Motorcars v. Navarro, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a Supreme Court of the United States case addressing overtime pay. [1] Specifically at issue is whether automotive service advisors are eligible for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

  3. Auer v. Robbins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auer_v._Robbins

    Section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 exempted "bona fide executive, administrative, or professional" employees from overtime pay requirements. [2] In determining whether an employee was exempt, the US Department of Labor and the Secretary of Labor applied a "salary-basis" test in 1940 that was not applicable to state and local employees.

  4. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ...

    www.aol.com/news/controversial-labor-law-doesnt...

    The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ...

  5. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Labor_Standards_Act...

    Department of Labor poster notifying employees of rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 29 U.S.C. § 203 [1] (FLSA) is a United States labor law that creates the right to a minimum wage, and "time-and-a-half" overtime pay when people work over forty hours a week.

  6. To Be Exempt or Not Exempt; That Is the Question - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/exempt-not-exempt-100021197.html

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Uber and Lyft drivers remain independent contractors in ...

    www.aol.com/news/uber-lyft-drivers-remain...

    The ruling upholds a voter-approved law passed in 2020 that said drivers for companies like Uber and Lyft are independent contractors and are not entitled to benefits like overtime pay, paid sick ...

  8. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    The California courts have long grappled with the appropriate standard for determining whether a worker is properly classified as an employee or an independent contractor for the purpose of California’s employment laws. At common law, the employment relationship was determined by the degree of control over the details of the work being performed.

  9. California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Assembly_Bill_5...

    California Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman issued his ruling on August 10, 2020, stating that Uber and Lyft must treat their drivers as employees under AB-5, as their work in the context of the "ABC test" was not outside the usual course of their business, nor was a "multi-sided platform" as Uber and Lyft had argued but simply ...