Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fritz Heider discovered Attribution theory during a time when psychologists were furthering research on personality, social psychology, and human motivation. [5] Heider worked alone in his research, but stated that he wished for Attribution theory not to be attributed to him because many different ideas and people were involved in the process. [5]
Attribution theory also provides explanations for why different people can interpret the same event in different ways and what factors contribute to attribution biases. [ 10 ] Psychologist Fritz Heider first discussed attributions in his 1958 book, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations . [ 1 ]
Attribution (psychology), concept in psychology whereby people attribute traits and causes to things they observe; Extreme event attribution, estimation of how climate change affects recent extreme weather events; Performance attribution, technique in quantitative finance for explaining the active performance of a portfolio
The tendency for some people, especially those with depression, to overestimate the likelihood of negative things happening to them. (compare optimism bias) Present bias: The tendency of people to give stronger weight to payoffs that are closer to the present time when considering trade-offs between two future moments. [110] Plant blindness
Dispositional attribution (or internal attribution or personal attribution) is a phrase in personality psychology that refers to the tendency to assign responsibility for others' behaviors due to their inherent characteristics, such as their personality, beliefs, or ability, instead of attributing it to external (situational) influences such as the individual's environment or culture. [1]
In other words, the subjects were unable to properly see the influence of the situational constraints placed upon the writers; they could not refrain from attributing sincere belief to the writers. The experimental group provided more internal attributions towards the writer.
In other words, this theory suggests that humans are, in fact, both naive scientists and cognitive misers. [ 9 ] [ page needed ] In this sense people are strategic instead of passively choosing the most effortless shortcuts when they allocate their cognitive efforts, and therefore they can decide to be naïve scientists or cognitive misers ...
Different forms of money may lead to different extents of money worship. A banknote has a given amount of value, so the extent to which a money worshiper spends is limited. On the other hand, credit cards offer almost unlimited amounts of money to the person, which can lead to high debt and negative psychological impacts such as higher anxiety ...