Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [1] is a United Kingdom constitutional law case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017, which ruled that the British Government (the executive) might not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union ...
The case was only the second case heard by eleven justices in the Supreme Court's history; the first was R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (2017), which delivered an 8–3 verdict that the royal prerogative could not be used to invoke Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [2018] AC 61 [22] (Dissenting): Lord Reed wrote the leading dissenting judgment in the Article 50 litigation, holding that the Government could initiate the UK's withdrawal from the European Union without reference to Parliament
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40: 24 May R (A and B) v Secretary of State for Health [2017] UKSC 41: 14 June R (Kiarie and Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42: 14 June Globalia Business Travel SAU of Spain v Fulton Shipping Inc of Panama [2017] UKSC 43: 28 June Lord Advocate v Dean [2017 ...
Miller's case was a "reverse false claim" contending that Citigroup kept money it should have paid. Jane Fraser, Citigroup's chief executive, has made cleaning up the New York-based bank's ...
Immediately after the announcement of prorogation on 28 August, Cherry applied to the court for an interim interdict to prevent prorogation until the case could be heard; [45] on the same day, Gina Miller, who previously defeated the Government on the use of the royal prerogative in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ...
Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finance, sports and much more.
In a September 2023 interview, Miller said Trump would need to “mobilize the U.S. military, state, federal, and local law enforcement” to round up people, then “build an extremely large ...