Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [1] is a United Kingdom constitutional law case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017, which ruled that the British Government (the executive) might not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union ...
The case was only the second case heard by eleven justices in the Supreme Court's history; the first was R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (2017), which delivered an 8–3 verdict that the royal prerogative could not be used to invoke Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [2018] AC 61 [22] (Dissenting): Lord Reed wrote the leading dissenting judgment in the Article 50 litigation, holding that the Government could initiate the UK's withdrawal from the European Union without reference to Parliament
Gina Nadira Miller [7] (née Singh; born 19 April 1965) [8] is a Guyanese-British business owner and activist who initiated the 2016 R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union court case against the British government over its authority to implement Brexit without approval from Parliament.
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40: 24 May R (A and B) v Secretary of State for Health [2017] UKSC 41: 14 June R (Kiarie and Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42: 14 June Globalia Business Travel SAU of Spain v Fulton Shipping Inc of Panama [2017] UKSC 43: 28 June Lord Advocate v Dean [2017 ...
[2] [3] [4] He represented the UK Government in the R (Miller and Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union case in 2016, [5] and in the R (Miller) v The Prime Minister case in 2019. [6] Eadie was born in March 1962 in Kensington, London, England. [7] [8] He attended Radley College and Magdalene College, Cambridge.
In a September 2023 interview, Miller said Trump would need to “mobilize the U.S. military, state, federal, and local law enforcement” to round up people, then “build an extremely large ...
The titles of these cases now follow the pattern of R (on the application of [X]) v [Y], notated as R ([X]) v [Y], for short. Thus, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is R (on the application of Miller and other) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, where "Miller" is Gina Miller, a citizen.