enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Federal Rules of Evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence

    Rule 102. Purpose; Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence; Rule 104. Preliminary Questions; Rule 105. Limiting Evidence that is Not Admissible Against other Parties or for Other Purposes; Rule 106. Remainder of or Related Writings or Recorded Statements; Judicial Notice Rule 201. Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts; Presumptions in Civil Actions and ...

  3. Harmless error - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmless_error

    If the judge allows the expert to testify that there was a reason to explain away inconsistencies in the witness's testimony, this will most likely be grounds for an appeal, as in most cases evidence that only bolsters the credibility of a witness is not admissible.

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    evidence obtained with a search warrant is admissible even when police violate 'knock-and-announce' rule Rapanos v. United States: 547 U.S. 715 (2006) whether wetlands are part of the "navigable waters of the United States" and thus regulated by the Clean Water Act Davis v. Washington: 547 U.S. 813 (2006)

  5. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_v._Merrell_Dow...

    The Federal Rules of Evidence govern the admission of scientific evidence in a trial held in federal court. They require the trial judge to act as a gatekeeper before admitting the evidence, determining that the evidence is scientifically valid and relevant to the case at hand. Court membership; Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices

  6. Jencks Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jencks_Act

    In some cases, the production of documents must be made at a time prior to that required by the Jencks Act. [21] [22] [23] The Brady rule may require the prosecutor to disclose grand jury testimony prior to trial, if the information is exculpatory, as well as other Brady material. [24] In United States v.

  7. Illinois v. Gates - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Gates

    The Illinois Circuit Court decided that the search was unlawful based on the test established in the Supreme Court ruling in Spinelli v. United States . In essence, the affidavit did not provide enough evidence to establish probable cause, which led to the exclusion of evidence obtained on the basis of that warrant.

  8. In landmark Google ruling, a warning to companies about ...

    www.aol.com/news/landmark-google-ruling-warning...

    A landmark ruling on Monday that Alphabet's Google illegally monopolizes Web search also came with a rebuke for the tech giant for obscuring potential evidence in the case, and a warning to other ...

  9. Frye standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frye_standard

    In United States law, the Frye standard, Frye test, or general acceptance test is a judicial test used in some U.S. state courts to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence. It provides that expert opinion based on a scientific technique is admissible only when the technique is generally accepted as reliable in the relevant scientific ...